Skip to main content
BETA Regulatory Records. 3 minutes will help us improve.
Home
Menu
Search

Main navigation

  • At home
  • At work
  • In business
  • About

Main navigation

  • At home
  • At work
  • In business
  • About
  1. Home
  2. Disciplinary & Regulatory Records
  3. Andrew Nyamayaro

Disciplinary Record - Andrew Nyamayaro

Regulatory settlement agreement
Give feedback
Thank you. This feedback helps us to improve.

Disciplinary Record

Andrew Nyamayaro

Regulatory settlement agreement

Details
Decision date
25/03/2024
Published date
26/03/2024

Decision - Agreement Outcome: Regulatory settlement agreement ...

Decision - Agreement

Outcome: Regulatory settlement agreement

Outcome date: 25 March 2024

Published date: 26 March 2024

Firm details

Firm or organisation at date of publication and at time of matters giving rise to outcome

Name: Tann Law Solicitors Ltd

Address(es): 4 Manor Terrace, Coventry, CV1 2NU

Firm ID: 632516

Outcome details

This outcome was reached by agreement.

Decision details
1. Agreed outcome

1.1 Andrew Nyamayaro (Mr Nyamayaro) a solicitor and manager of Tann Law Solicitors Ltd. (the firm), agrees to the following outcome to the investigation of his conduct by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA):

  1. he is fined £1980
  2. to the publication of this agreement
  3. he will pay the costs of the investigation of £675
2. Summary of Facts

2.1 Mr Nyamayaro is the sole owner and manager of Tann Law Solicitors (the firm).

2.2 On 30 September 2022 the firm’s reporting accountants submitted two Qualified Accountants Reports covering the periods 1 April 2020 to 31 March 2021 and 1 April 2021 to 31 March 2022. The reports identified breaches of the SRA Accounts Rules (the rules).

2.3 The SRA investigated the reported breaches and conducted an onsite inspection. This identified the firm had failed to maintain proper books of account. In particular, the firm had failed to maintain a cashbook and failed to record all receipt of client funds into the client bank account on a client ledger. The firm had a debit balance on a client suspense ledger which could not at first be explained, had a cash shortage which could not at first be explained, had made incorrect client to office bank account transfers and had not undertaken client account reconciliations prior to the appointment of their current bookkeepers.

2.4 At his interview on 29 March 2023, Mr Nyamayaro agreed that he had not understood and fulfilled his duties as the Compliance Officer for Finance and Administration (COFA) from when the firm first operated a client account in November 2018, until he engaged bookkeepers and accountants in November 2019.

2.5 During the SRA's investigation the firm corrected the client to office account transfers and replaced the cash shortage.

2.6 The firm's books are now in compliance with our rules.

3. Admissions

3.1 Mr Nyamayaro admits breaching the following rules:

  1. Outcome 7.2 of SRA Handbook 2011 - you have effective systems and controls in place to achieve and comply with all the Principles, rules and outcomes and other requirements of the Handbook, where applicable.
  2. Solicitors Accounts Rules 2011 Rule 2 - you must comply with the Principles set out in the Handbook and the outcomes in Chapter 7 of the SRA Code of Conduct in relation to the effective financial management of the firm, and in particular must:

    (a) keep other people's money separate from money belonging to you or your firm;

    (e) establish and maintain proper accounting systems and proper internal controls over those systems, to ensure compliance with the rules;

    (f) keep proper accounting records to show accurately the position with regard to the money held for each client and trust.

4. Why a fine is an appropriate outcome

4.1 The SRA's Enforcement Strategy sets out its approach to the use of its enforcement powers where there has been a failure to meet its standards or requirements.

4.2 When considering the appropriate sanctions and controls in this matter, the SRA has taken into account the admissions made by Mr Nyamayaro and the following mitigation which he has put forward:

  1. He took steps to remedy the breach and prevent similar breaches arising in the future. These included engaging experienced bookkeepers to bring the firm's accounts in to order; employing experienced accountants; repaying the shortfall in the client ledger from his own funds; and arranging training for himself and the firm's staff.
  2. Once the SRA began its investigation, he made early and full admissions of the breaches which were identified.
  3. The firm's books are now compliant with our accounts rules.

4.3 The SRA considers that a fine is the appropriate outcome because:

  1. The conduct had the potential to cause significant harm.
  2. Mr Nyamayaro had direct control of and responsibility for his conduct which led to the breaches.
  3. The breaches were rectified and remedial action taken, but the conduct persisted longer than was reasonable.
  4. Proper record keeping for the holding of client money goes to the core of the SRA's regulatory role and public interest purpose. Firms hold client funds as custodians, and up to date and accurate accounting records ensure that the firm can properly account to clients.

4.4 A fine is appropriate to maintain professional standards and uphold public confidence in the solicitors' profession and in legal services provided by authorised persons because it fulfils the purpose of deterring the firm or individual and others from similar behaviour in future. A financial penalty therefore meets the requirements of rule 4.1 of the Regulatory and Disciplinary Procedure Rules.

5. Amount of the fine

5.1 The amount of the fine has been calculated in line with the SRA's published guidance on its approach to setting an appropriate financial penalty (the Guidance).

5.2 Having regard to the Guidance, the SRA and Mr Nyamayaro agree that the nature of the misconduct was more serious because the conduct continued for a long time. Mr Nyamayaro acknowledged he did not understand or fulfil his duties as COFA over a significant period. The role of the COFA is essential in protecting clients and the public from the risks of poor financial governance in relation to their money once it has been given to the firm. Clients were exposed to inadequate safeguards for their money throughout this time. The Guidance gives this type of misconduct a score of three.

5.3 The SRA considers that the impact of the misconduct was low because no client money was taken or lost. No cases have been identified as having been delayed or affected by the poor financial controls. The nature of the work the firm undertakes means the firm does not have large sums of client money exposed to risk whilst moving through the firm's systems. The Guidance gives this level of impact a score of two.

5.4 The nature and impact scores add up to five. The Guidance recommends a broad penalty bracket of between 5% and 11% of annual gross income.

5.5 In deciding the level of fine within this bracket, the SRA has considered the mitigation at paragraph 4.2 above which Mr Nyamayaro has put forward, alongside the aggravating factors at paragraph 4.3.

5.6 The SRA considers a basic penalty of £2,478.50 to be appropriate.

5.7 The SRA considers that the basic penalty should be reduced by 20% to £1980. This reduction reflects Mr Nyamayaro's cooperation, his rectification of the issues, and his admissions in relation to the conduct.

5.8 The information Mr Nyamayaro provided during the course of the investigation shows that he has continued to implement the changes and the firm is now managing its accounts appropriately.

5.9 Mr Nyamayaro has not made any financial gain or received any other benefit as a result of his conduct. Therefore, no adjustment is necessary to remove this, and the amount of the fine is £1980.

6. Publication

6.1 The SRA considers it appropriate that this agreement is published in the interests of transparency in the regulatory and disciplinary process. Mr Nyamayaro agrees to the publication of this agreement.

7. Acting in a way which is inconsistent with this agreement

7.1 Mr Nyamayaro agrees that he will not deny the admissions made in this agreement or act in any way which is inconsistent with it.

7.2 If Mr Nyamayaro denies the admissions or acts in a way which is inconsistent with this agreement, the conduct which is subject to this agreement may be considered further by the SRA. That may result in a disciplinary outcome or a referral to the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal on the original facts and allegations.

7.3 Denying the admissions made or acting in a way which is inconsistent with this agreement may also constitute a separate breach of principles 2 and 5 of the Principles and paragraph 7.3 of the Code of Conduct for Solicitors, RELs and RFLs.

8. Costs

8.1 Mr Nyamayaro agrees to pay the costs of the SRA's investigation in the sum of £675. Such costs are due within 28 days of a statement of costs due being issued by the SRA.

Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) records last published to this site at 7:40am on 09 May 2025. Originally published on the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) website.

Give feedback
Thank you. This feedback helps us to improve.
Thank you. This feedback helps us to improve.

Footer menu

  • Accessibility
  • Getting in touch
  • Privacy and cookies
  • Terms and conditions of use

CLC CLSB The Faculty Office ICAEW CILEx Regulation IPReg SRABSB

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
© Legal Choices All Rights Reserved
Got a spare 5 minutes to help us improve our website?

I'll do itNo thanks

  • At home
    • Arrested
      • My child has been arrested
    • Carers
      • Why baby boomers should care about Britney
    • Claims
      • Problems with your pension?
      • No win no fee
    • Courts
      • I'm due in court
        • I'm due in a criminal court
        • I'm due in a civil court
        • I'm due in a Family court
        • I’m under 18 and going to court
      • I want to take someone to court
        • High value claims
        • Small claims
        • Personal injury
      • I want to represent myself in court
      • The lowdown on going to court
    • Debt
    • Families
      • Divorce
      • I'm young and have a problem
      • I've got family problems
      • Meeting your family lawyer for the first time?
      • Understanding family law
      • Domestic abuse
    • Housing
      • Buying and selling: Finding a legal adviser
      • ID and money home-buying checks - why they are needed
      • Problems with buying or selling
      • Evictions - England
      • Evictions - Wales
      • Rent money, deposits and fees - England
      • Rent Money, Deposits and Fees – Wales
      • Repairs and poor living conditions - England
      • Repairs and poor living conditions - Wales
      • Being a landlord
    • Immigration and emigration
      • Immigration solicitors and legal advisers
      • Asylum
      • Emigration
    • Injuries
      • Negligence
    • Legal documents
    • My legal bill
    • Pets
      • What to consider before buying a pet
      • How old do I need to be to own a pet?
      • What pets are legal in the UK
      • Pet purchase protection
      • Pet owner responsibilities
      • Microchipping
    • Rights
      • I have been discriminated against
      • I want to know my rights
      • Your consumer rights this Christmas 
      • Your guide to defamation
    • Wills
      • I want to challenge a will
      • I want to make a will
      • Probate
      • Simpler choices when you make a will
  • At work
    • Confidentiality
    • Problems at work
      • Mental health in the workplace
      • Got a legal issue at work?
      • I’m not happy about something my employer has done
      • Speaking up about sexual harassment – Three things you should know
    • Employment rights
      • Covid vaccine: Can workers be forced to have the jab?
      • Time off
    • Redundancy and dismissal
      • Employment rights and dismissal
      • Redundancy and the law
  • In business
    • Copyright and ideas
      • Control of your images online 
      • Legal protection for ideas
      • Protecting ideas
    • Lawyer checklist
    • Factsheet: Business structure
    • Factsheet: Employment law
    • Factsheet: Tax law
    • Factsheet: Insurance for small business
    • Factsheet: Trading law
    • Factsheet: Premises and property
  • About
    • Types of legal advisers
      • Regulated legal advisers
        • Barristers
        • Chartered Legal Executives and CILEx Practitioners
        • Costs Lawyers
        • ICAEW Chartered Accountants and Legal Services
        • Immigration Advisers
        • Licensed Conveyancers
        • Notaries
        • Solicitors
        • Trade Mark Attorneys and Patent Attorneys
      • Other legal advisers
        • Charity and Trade Union Advisers
        • McKenzie Friends
        • Mediators
        • Paralegals
        • Will Writers
      • Legal market place
        • Customer reviews and comparison sites
          • Finding out more on the provider’s website
          • Choosing a legal adviser – other factors
          • Leaving a review
          • Complaints to legal services providers
        • DIY
        • My legal options
    • Registers of legal professionals
    • Contact a legal regulator
    • If you want to complain
    • Legal costs
      • Conditional and contingency fee agreements
      • Law Centres
      • Legal aid
      • Legal insurance
      • Paying in instalments
      • Questions to ask lawyers
      • Sources of free legal advice
      • The Money Helper site
      • Why money laundering checks are important
    • About the Legal Choices website
      • Accessibility
      • Disclaimer statement
      • Privacy
      • Terms and conditions of use
    • Going online to find a legal adviser?
    • Can I handle some of my legal work myself?
Feedback
Thank you. This feedback helps us to improve.
Back to top