Skip to main content
BETA Regulatory Records. 3 minutes will help us improve.
Home
Menu
Search

Main navigation

  • At home
  • At work
  • In business
  • About

Main navigation

  • At home
  • At work
  • In business
  • About
  1. Home
  2. Disciplinary & Regulatory Records
  3. Angela Craig

Disciplinary Record - Angela Craig

Regulatory settlement agreement
Give feedback
Thank you. This feedback helps us to improve.

Disciplinary Record

Angela Craig

Regulatory settlement agreement

Details
Decision date
11/10/2023
Published date
16/10/2023

Decision - Agreement Outcome: Regulatory settlement agreement ...

Decision - Agreement

Outcome: Regulatory settlement agreement

Outcome date: 11 October 2023

Published date: 16 October 2023

Firm details

Firm or organisation at date of publication and at time of matters giving rise to outcome

Name: Higgs LLP

Address(es): 3 Waterfront Business Park, Brierley Hill, DY5 1LX, England

Firm ID: 819589

Outcome details

This outcome was reached by agreement.

Decision details
1. Agreed outcome

1.1 Ms Angela Craig (Ms Craig), a former employee of Higgs LLP (the firm), a licensed body, agrees to the following outcome to the investigation of her conduct by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA):

  1. From the date of this agreement, Ms Craig is disqualified under section 99 of the Legal Services Act 2007 from:
    1. Acting as Head of Legal Practice of any licensed body
    2. Acting as Head of Finance and Administration of any licensed body
    3. Being a manager of any licensed body, or
    4. Being employed by any licensed body
  2. To pay the investigation costs of £675
2. Summary of facts

2.1 Ms Craig was employed as a Legal Executive by Hison Services Limited ('Hison') incorporated from August 2021 to November 2022. As a Legal Executive, Ms Craig's role and responsibilities included: engaging with clients, maintenance and preparation of estate accounts, responsibility for estate administration files, interpreting wills, and working knowledge of Inland Revenue processes and procedures.

2.2 Her employment contract is between herself, Hison and the firm. Hison is a service company that provides certain services to Higgs and is an ultimate subsidiary of Higgs LLP. There is no definition of 'employee' in the Legal Services Act 2007. However, the SRA Glossary definition of 'employee' is as follows: 'means an individual who is engaged 2 Sensitivity: Confidential under a contract of service by a person, firm or organisation or its wholly owned service company'.

2.3 Ms Craig therefore meets the definition of 'employee' as she was engaged under a contract of service by Hison which is a wholly owned service company of Higgs LLP.

2.4 The firm's identification of the issue and its internal investigation 2.4 The firm identified that in two separate probate matters in June and July 2022, Ms Craig misled the clients of the firm. In both cases she informed the clients that applications for Grant of Probate had been submitted to the Probate Registry when they had not.

2.5 The firm investigated the matter and established that in neither case the Grant of Probate had been submitted. This was rectified by the firm submitting the relevant applications.

2.6 The breach was then reported to the SRA.

The SRA's investigation

2.7 The SRA reviewed the firm's internal investigation papers including emails sent by Ms Craig to both clients. The firm also provided evidence from the Probate Registry that the applications had not been completed.

Email correspondence and misleading statements

2.8 The emails were provided by the firm as Ms Craig had left the firm by the time the SRA investigation commenced. Both emails to the relevant clients stated that the submissions had been made to the Probate Registry.

2.9 In the first client matter, Ms Craig sent an email to the client on 4 July 2022 stating: 'I have now lodged the probate application with the probate registry so that we can obtain the Grant of Probate. The time estimate for the issue of grants remains at 8 weeks but I will check on progress online and let you know as soon as the grant has been issued.'

2.10 In the second client matter, Ms Craig sent an email to the client on 20 June 2022 stating: 'I am still waiting for the Grant of Probate and totally in the hands of the probate registry.'

3. Admissions

3.1 Ms Craig admits, and the SRA accepts, that by agreeing to the conduct summarised above she breached the following SRA principles:

  1. Principle 2 which states you act – in a way that upholds public trust and confident in the solicitors' profession and in legal services provided by the authorised persons;
  2. Principle 4 which states you act – with honesty, and;
  3. Principle 5 which states you act – with integrity.

3.2 Ms Craig agrees, and the SRA accepts, that her conduct means that it is undesirable for her to be engaged in the activities mentioned in section 1.1.

4. Why the agreed outcome is appropriate
Section 99 disqualification

4.1 Ms Craig and the SRA agree that a disqualification is appropriate because:

  1. The firm is a licensed body
  2. Ms Craig has breached rules as described in Paragraph 3 above which, by virtue of section 176 Legal Services Act 2007 (LSA), applied to her as she was an 'employee' of the firm
  3. The conditions in rule 5 of the SRA's Regulatory and Disciplinary Procedure Rules (RDPRs) are met, in that:
    1. It is undesirable for Ms Craig to engage in the activities listed in 1.1(a) of this agreement, and
    2. Disqualification is a proportionate outcome in the public interest because it will prevent Ms Craig from undertaking a similar role at another firm and helps maintain trust in the profession as a whole

4.2 It is undesirable for Ms Craig to engage in the activities listed in paragraph 1.1(a) of this agreement, for the following reasons:

  1. In the first client matter, she informed the client that the application for Grant of Probate had been submitted to the Probate Registry, when it had not. Ms Craig's conduct was dishonest and lacking integrity because at the time of drafting the email, Ms Craig was possessed of the knowledge that the application had not been submitted and that her email did not accurately reflect the position of her client's matter.
  2. In the second client matter, Ms Craig informed the client that the application for Grant of Probate had been submitted to the Probate Registry. Ms Craig further demonstrated conduct that was dishonest and lacking integrity because at the 4 Sensitivity: Confidential time she sent her email, Ms Craig was aware the application had not been submitted and her email did not accurately reflect the position of her client's matter.
  3. Despite being at the firm for a further 4 months, Ms Craig did not take any opportunity to inform anyone of what she had done.

4.3 In deciding that disqualification is proportionate, the SRA has taken into account of the disqualification criteria in rule 5 of the RDPRs and the following mitigation which Ms Craig has put forward:

  1. She has fully cooperated and engaged with the SRA;
  2. She has provided regret and remorse for what she has done and she apologises to the firm, her former colleagues and the clients involved
5. Publication

5.1 The SRA considers it is appropriate that this is agreement is published both in the interests of transparency in the regulatory process and due to the regulatory legal guidance which demands publication when dealing with a licensed body, such as Higgs LLP.

5.2 The Legal Services Board rules (Registers of licensed bodies: section 87(4) rules (version 2)' dated April 2018) state that the SRA, as a licensing authority, must publish a register of licensed bodies. This register must include details of any enforcement action or sanction on the licensed body, its owner or any employee not including administrative fines

6. Acting in a way which is inconsistent with this agreement

6.1 Ms Craig agrees that she will not deny the admitted acts and will not act in a way which is inconsistent with this agreement.

7. Costs

7.1 Ms Craig agrees to pay the costs of the SRA's investigation in the sum of £675. Such costs are due within 28 days of a statement of costs being issues by the SRA.

Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) records last published to this site at 7:40am on 09 May 2025. Originally published on the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) website.

Give feedback
Thank you. This feedback helps us to improve.
Thank you. This feedback helps us to improve.

Footer menu

  • Accessibility
  • Getting in touch
  • Privacy and cookies
  • Terms and conditions of use

CLC CLSB The Faculty Office ICAEW CILEx Regulation IPReg SRABSB

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
© Legal Choices All Rights Reserved
Got a spare 5 minutes to help us improve our website?

I'll do itNo thanks

  • At home
    • Arrested
      • My child has been arrested
    • Carers
      • Why baby boomers should care about Britney
    • Claims
      • Problems with your pension?
      • No win no fee
    • Courts
      • I'm due in court
        • I'm due in a criminal court
        • I'm due in a civil court
        • I'm due in a Family court
        • I’m under 18 and going to court
      • I want to take someone to court
        • High value claims
        • Small claims
        • Personal injury
      • I want to represent myself in court
      • The lowdown on going to court
    • Debt
    • Families
      • Divorce
      • I'm young and have a problem
      • I've got family problems
      • Meeting your family lawyer for the first time?
      • Understanding family law
      • Domestic abuse
    • Housing
      • Buying and selling: Finding a legal adviser
      • ID and money home-buying checks - why they are needed
      • Problems with buying or selling
      • Evictions - England
      • Evictions - Wales
      • Rent money, deposits and fees - England
      • Rent Money, Deposits and Fees – Wales
      • Repairs and poor living conditions - England
      • Repairs and poor living conditions - Wales
      • Being a landlord
    • Immigration and emigration
      • Immigration solicitors and legal advisers
      • Asylum
      • Emigration
    • Injuries
      • Negligence
    • Legal documents
    • My legal bill
    • Pets
      • What to consider before buying a pet
      • How old do I need to be to own a pet?
      • What pets are legal in the UK
      • Pet purchase protection
      • Pet owner responsibilities
      • Microchipping
    • Rights
      • I have been discriminated against
      • I want to know my rights
      • Your consumer rights this Christmas 
      • Your guide to defamation
    • Wills
      • I want to challenge a will
      • I want to make a will
      • Probate
      • Simpler choices when you make a will
  • At work
    • Confidentiality
    • Problems at work
      • Mental health in the workplace
      • Got a legal issue at work?
      • I’m not happy about something my employer has done
      • Speaking up about sexual harassment – Three things you should know
    • Employment rights
      • Covid vaccine: Can workers be forced to have the jab?
      • Time off
    • Redundancy and dismissal
      • Employment rights and dismissal
      • Redundancy and the law
  • In business
    • Copyright and ideas
      • Control of your images online 
      • Legal protection for ideas
      • Protecting ideas
    • Lawyer checklist
    • Factsheet: Business structure
    • Factsheet: Employment law
    • Factsheet: Tax law
    • Factsheet: Insurance for small business
    • Factsheet: Trading law
    • Factsheet: Premises and property
  • About
    • Types of legal advisers
      • Regulated legal advisers
        • Barristers
        • Chartered Legal Executives and CILEx Practitioners
        • Costs Lawyers
        • ICAEW Chartered Accountants and Legal Services
        • Immigration Advisers
        • Licensed Conveyancers
        • Notaries
        • Solicitors
        • Trade Mark Attorneys and Patent Attorneys
      • Other lawyers
        • Charity and Trade Union Advisers
        • McKenzie Friends
        • Mediators
        • Paralegals
        • Will Writers
      • Legal market place
        • Customer reviews and comparison sites
          • Finding out more on the provider’s website
          • Choosing a legal adviser – other factors
          • Leaving a review
          • Complaints to legal services providers
        • DIY
        • My legal options
    • Registers of legal professionals
    • Contact a legal regulator
    • If you want to complain
    • Legal costs
      • Conditional and contingency fee agreements
      • Law Centres
      • Legal aid
      • Legal insurance
      • Paying in instalments
      • Questions to ask lawyers
      • Sources of free legal advice
      • The Money Helper site
      • Why money laundering checks are important
    • About the Legal Choices website
      • Accessibility
      • Disclaimer statement
      • Privacy
      • Terms and conditions of use
    • Going online to find a legal adviser?
    • Can I handle some of my legal work myself?
Feedback
Thank you. This feedback helps us to improve.
Back to top