Skip to main content
BETA Regulatory Records. 3 minutes will help us improve.
Home
Menu
Search

Main navigation

  • At home
  • At work
  • In business
  • About

Main navigation

  • At home
  • At work
  • In business
  • About
  1. Home
  2. Disciplinary & Regulatory Records
  3. Craig Johnson

Disciplinary Record - Craig Johnson

Give feedback
Thank you. This feedback helps us to improve.

Disciplinary Record

Craig Johnson

Details

21 September 2023ChargesCraig Johnson, a CILEx Paralegal Member (ACILEX), admits the following allegations of professional misconduct:Allegation 1aCraig Johnson failed to maintain high standards of pr...

21 September 2023

Charges

Craig Johnson, a CILEx Paralegal Member (ACILEX), admits the following allegations of professional misconduct:

Allegation 1a

Craig Johnson failed to maintain high standards of professional and personal conduct and justify public trust in himself, his profession, and the provision of legal services.

Contrary to Principle 2, Outcome 2.2 of the CILEx Code of Conduct 2019

Allegation 1b

Craig Johnson failed to behave with integrity.

Contrary to Principle 3, Outcome 3.2 of the CILEx Code of Conduct 2019

In that on or about the 5th April 2022 he misled or attempted to mislead CILEx Regulation into  believing that he had acted as a police station representative on one occasion only, by instructing his solicitor to inform CILEx Regulation that “on one discrete and isolated occasion” he made “an error of judgement and attended a police station interview when this was not true and had attended such interviews in that capacity previously.

Allegation 2a

Craig Johnson failed to maintain high standards of professional and personal conduct and justify public trust in himself, his profession, and the provision of legal services

Contrary to Principle 2, Outcome 2.2 of the CILEx Code of Conduct 2019

Allegation 2b

Craig Johnson failed to behave with honesty and integrity.

Contrary to Principle 3, Outcomes 3.1 and 3.2 of the CILEx Code of Conduct 2019

Allegation 2c

Craig Johnson failed to comply with his legal and regulatory obligations and deal with his regulators openly, promptly and co-operatively.

Contrary to Principle 4, Outcome 4.2 of the CILEx Code of Conduct 2019

In that on 24 November 2020 when he applied for CILEX membership, and when renewing his  membership in 2021 and 2022, he misled or attempted to mislead CILEX and/or CILEx Regulation into believing he had not engaged in any conduct that may be relevant to his suitability to become a CILEX member, including the fact that:

  • he was investigated and sanctioned (warning) by the National Association of Licensed Paralegals
  • he was arrested in July 2022 and is currently under investigation by the police for allegations of fraud

Craig Johnson knew or ought to have known that such conduct should have been disclosed to CILEX Regulation at the earliest opportunity in accordance with Rules 11 and 12 of the CILEx   Regulation Enforcement Rules but he failed to do so.

Allegation 3a

Craig Johnson failed to maintain high standards of professional and personal conduct and justify public trust in himself, his profession, and the provision of legal services.

Contrary to Principle 2, Outcome 2.2 of the CILEx Code of Conduct 2019

Allegation 3b

Craig Johnson failed to behave with integrity.

Contrary to Principle 3, Outcome 3.2 of the CILEx Code of Conduct 2019

In that on 19 June 2023, he set up a company, National Legal Consultants Ltd (NLC), which claimed on its website to have regulatory oversight of legal consultancy companies. Craig Johnson knew or ought to have known that the information on his website would mislead the public and consumers into believing that it was an independent and objective regulator when it was not.

Allegation 4a

Craig Johnson failed to maintain high standards of professional and personal conduct and justify public trust in himself, his profession, and the provision of legal services.

Contrary to Principle 2, Outcome 2.2 of the CILEx Code of Conduct 2019

Allegation 4b

Craig Johnson failed to behave with honesty and integrity.

Contrary to Principle 3, Outcome 3.2 of the CILEx Code of Conduct 2019

In that in a judgment dated 23rd August 2023, Craig Johnson was found, following his admissions at a hearing at the Royal Court of Justice on 23 August 2023, that he had drawn up an order dated the 23 December 2021 “granting the Petitioner’s Petition for Divorce” which was not genuine. Mr Johnson has also admitted to a further two instances where he has drafted non-genuine court orders or papers.

Outcome – DBC

CILEx Regulation accepted the admission and agreed a Determination by Consent with Craig Johnson with the following sanction(s).

Sanction – Exclusion

Craig Johnson was excluded from CILEx membership for 15 years, after which time he will not be entitled to automatic reinstatement.

CILEx Regulation records last published to this site at 7:38am on 14 June 2025. Originally published on the CILEx Regulation website.

Give feedback
Thank you. This feedback helps us to improve.
Thank you. This feedback helps us to improve.

Footer menu

  • Accessibility
  • Getting in touch
  • Privacy and cookies
  • Terms and conditions of use

CLC CLSB The Faculty Office ICAEW CILEx Regulation IPReg SRABSB

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
© Legal Choices All Rights Reserved
Got a spare 5 minutes to help us improve our website?

I'll do itNo thanks

  • At home
    • Arrested
      • My child has been arrested
    • Carers
      • Why baby boomers should care about Britney
    • Claims
      • Problems with your pension?
      • No win no fee
    • Courts
      • I'm due in court
        • I'm due in a criminal court
        • I'm due in a civil court
        • I'm due in a Family court
        • I’m under 18 and going to court
      • I want to take someone to court
        • High value claims
        • Small claims
        • Personal injury
      • I want to represent myself in court
      • The lowdown on going to court
    • Debt
    • Families
      • Divorce
      • I'm young and have a problem
      • I've got family problems
      • Meeting your family lawyer for the first time?
      • Understanding family law
      • Domestic abuse
    • Housing
      • Buying and selling: Finding a legal adviser
      • ID and money home-buying checks - why they are needed
      • Problems with buying or selling
      • Evictions - England
      • Evictions - Wales
      • Rent money, deposits and fees - England
      • Rent Money, Deposits and Fees – Wales
      • Repairs and poor living conditions - England
      • Repairs and poor living conditions - Wales
      • Being a landlord
    • Immigration and emigration
      • Immigration solicitors and legal advisers
      • Asylum
      • Emigration
    • Injuries
      • Negligence
    • Legal documents
    • My legal bill
    • Pets
      • What to consider before buying a pet
      • How old do I need to be to own a pet?
      • What pets are legal in the UK
      • Pet purchase protection
      • Pet owner responsibilities
      • Microchipping
    • Rights
      • I have been discriminated against
      • I want to know my rights
      • Your consumer rights this Christmas 
      • Your guide to defamation
    • Wills
      • I want to challenge a will
      • I want to make a will
      • Probate
      • Simpler choices when you make a will
  • At work
    • Confidentiality
    • Problems at work
      • Mental health in the workplace
      • Got a legal issue at work?
      • I’m not happy about something my employer has done
      • Speaking up about sexual harassment – Three things you should know
    • Employment rights
      • Covid vaccine: Can workers be forced to have the jab?
      • Time off
    • Redundancy and dismissal
      • Employment rights and dismissal
      • Redundancy and the law
  • In business
    • Copyright and ideas
      • Control of your images online 
      • Legal protection for ideas
      • Protecting ideas
    • Lawyer checklist
    • Factsheet: Business structure
    • Factsheet: Employment law
    • Factsheet: Tax law
    • Factsheet: Insurance for small business
    • Factsheet: Trading law
    • Factsheet: Premises and property
  • About
    • Types of legal advisers
      • Regulated legal advisers
        • Barristers
        • Chartered Legal Executives and CILEx Practitioners
        • Costs Lawyers
        • ICAEW Chartered Accountants and Legal Services
        • Immigration Advisers
        • Licensed Conveyancers
        • Notaries
        • Solicitors
        • Trade Mark Attorneys and Patent Attorneys
      • Other legal advisers
        • Charity and Trade Union Advisers
        • McKenzie Friends
        • Mediators
        • Paralegals
        • Will Writers
      • Legal market place
        • Customer reviews and comparison sites
          • Finding out more on the provider’s website
          • Choosing a legal adviser – other factors
          • Leaving a review
          • Complaints to legal services providers
        • DIY
        • My legal options
    • Registers of legal professionals
    • Contact a legal regulator
    • If you want to complain
    • Legal costs
      • Conditional and contingency fee agreements
      • Law Centres
      • Legal aid
      • Legal insurance
      • Paying in instalments
      • Questions to ask lawyers
      • Sources of free legal advice
      • The Money Helper site
      • Why money laundering checks are important
    • About the Legal Choices website
      • Accessibility
      • Disclaimer statement
      • Privacy
      • Terms and conditions of use
    • Going online to find a legal adviser?
    • Can I handle some of my legal work myself?
    • What to expect from your legal adviser
Feedback
Thank you. This feedback helps us to improve.
Back to top