Skip to main content
BETA Regulatory Records. 3 minutes will help us improve.
Home
Menu
Search

Main navigation

  • At home
  • At work
  • In business
  • About

Main navigation

  • At home
  • At work
  • In business
  • About
  1. Home
  2. Disciplinary & Regulatory Records
  3. Howard Ellis

Disciplinary Record - Howard Ellis

Control of non-qualified staff (Section 43 / Section 99 order)
Give feedback
Thank you. This feedback helps us to improve.

Disciplinary Record

Howard Ellis

Control of non-qualified staff (Section 43 / Section 99 order)

Details
Decision date
23/03/2023
Published date
13/04/2023

Decision - Employee-related decision Outcome: Control of non-qualified staff (...

Decision - Employee-related decision

Outcome: Control of non-qualified staff (Section 43 / Section 99 order)

Outcome date: 23 March 2023

Published date: 13 April 2023

Firm details

Firm or organisation at time of matters giving rise to outcome

Name: Latham & Watkins (London) LLP

Address(es): 99 Bishopsgate LONDON EC2M 3XF

Firm ID: 203820

Outcome details

This outcome was reached by SRA decision.

Decision details
1. Agreed outcome

1.1 Mr Howard Ellis (Mr Ellis), a former employee of Latham and Watkins (London) LLP (the Firm), agrees to the following outcome to the investigation of his conduct by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA):

  1. to the SRA making an order under section 43 of the Solicitors Act 1974 (a section 43 order) in relation to Mr Ellis that, from the date of this agreement:
    1. no solicitor shall employ or remunerate him in connection with his practice as a solicitor
    2. no employee of a solicitor shall employ or remunerate him in connection with the solicitor's practice
    3. no recognised body shall employ or remunerate him
    4. no manager or employee of a recognised body shall employ or remunerate him in connection with the business of that body
    5. no recognised body or manager or employee of such a body shall permit him to be a manager of the body
    6. no recognised body or manager or employee of such body shall permit him to have an interest in the body

    except in accordance with the SRA's prior permission

  2. to the publication of this agreement
  3. he will pay the costs of the investigation of £300.
2. Summary of facts

2.1 Mr Ellis was employed by the Firm as a Workplace Experience Specialist from 1 May 2012 until 6 July 2022.

2.2 Mr Ellis’ duties and responsibilities in the role included liaison with other employees, on-site facilities activities and serving as a member of the Firm’s life safety and emergency team. In addition, Mr Ellis had IT responsibilities which included the utilisation and maintenance of databases.

2.3 On 13 April 2022 Mr Ellis pleaded guilty to three counts of making indecent photographs or pseudo-photographs of a child, one count of possessing a prohibited image of a child, and one count of possessing extreme pornographic images.

2.4 On 4 July 2022, at Woolwich Crown Court Mr Ellis was sentenced to 10 months imprisonment and placed under the terms of a ten-year Sexual Harm Prevention Order (SHPO).

2.5 Mr Ellis’ employment was terminated on 6 July 2022 by the Firm after it found out that Mr Ellis had been charged and convicted and received a custodial sentence.

2.6 The Firm notified the SRA of Mr Ellis’ conviction on 19 July 2022.

3. Admissions

3.1 Mr Ellis makes the following admissions which the SRA accepts, that by virtue of his conviction, it means that it is undesirable for him to be involved in a legal practice.

4. Why a section 43 order is appropriate

4.1 The SRA’s Enforcement Strategy and its guidance on how it regulates non-authorised persons, sets out its approach to using section 43 orders to control where a non-authorised person can work.

4.2 When considering whether a section 43 order is appropriate in this matter, the SRA has taken into account the admissions made by Mr Ellis and the following mitigation which he has put forward:

  1. He pleaded guilty at the earliest opportunity.
  2. He has co-operated with our investigation.

4.3 The SRA and Mr Ellis agree that a section 43 order is appropriate because:

  1. Mr Ellis is not a solicitor
  2. his employment or remuneration at the Firm means that he was involved in a legal practice
  3. he has been convicted of an offence which makes it undesirable for him to be involved in a legal practice.

4.4 The offence makes it undesirable for Mr Ellis to be involved in a legal practice because of the nature of his convictions (four sexual offences relating to children). In giving a custodial sentence and a ten-year SHPO this shows the seriousness of the conviction. The nature and seriousness of the convictions damages public confidence and trust in the profession.

4.5 Mr Ellis’ role was within the facilities department. He had contact with and liaised with other employees at all levels of seniority across the organisation, as a normal part of his day to day role. He would also have had potential contact with clients and other persons who had reason to visit the premises. Additionally, Mr Ellis had access to the Firm’s IT systems. Therefore the nature and seriousness of the convictions presents a risk of future damage or harm towards clients of any firm Mr Ellis may go on to work for, employees of any such firm, and the firm itself.

5. Publication

5.1 The SRA considers it appropriate that this agreement is published in the interests of transparency in the regulatory process. Mr Ellis agrees to the publication of this agreement.

6. Acting in a way which is inconsistent with this agreement

6.1 Mr Ellis agrees that he will not deny the admissions made in this agreement or act in any way which is inconsistent with it.

7. Costs

7.1 Mr Ellis agrees to pay the costs of the SRA's investigation in the sum of £300. Such costs are due within 28 days of a statement of costs due being issued by the SRA.

Reasons/basis

Mr Ellis has accepted responsibility for his actions and has no intention to work in a legal practice again. On that basis a s43 seemed suitable and two IMs agreed to this being dealt with by way of an RSA.

Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) records last published to this site at 5:10am on 09 May 2025. Originally published on the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) website.

Give feedback
Thank you. This feedback helps us to improve.
Thank you. This feedback helps us to improve.

Footer menu

  • Accessibility
  • Getting in touch
  • Privacy and cookies
  • Terms and conditions of use

CLC CLSB The Faculty Office ICAEW CILEx Regulation IPReg SRABSB

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
© Legal Choices All Rights Reserved
Got a spare 5 minutes to help us improve our website?

I'll do itNo thanks

  • At home
    • Arrested
      • My child has been arrested
    • Carers
      • Why baby boomers should care about Britney
    • Claims
      • Problems with your pension?
      • No win no fee
    • Courts
      • I'm due in court
        • I'm due in a criminal court
        • I'm due in a civil court
        • I'm due in a Family court
        • I’m under 18 and going to court
      • I want to take someone to court
        • High value claims
        • Small claims
        • Personal injury
      • I want to represent myself in court
      • The lowdown on going to court
    • Debt
    • Families
      • Divorce
      • I'm young and have a problem
      • I've got family problems
      • Meeting your family lawyer for the first time?
      • Understanding family law
      • Domestic abuse
    • Housing
      • Buying and selling: Finding a legal adviser
      • ID and money home-buying checks - why they are needed
      • Problems with buying or selling
      • Evictions - England
      • Evictions - Wales
      • Rent money, deposits and fees - England
      • Rent Money, Deposits and Fees – Wales
      • Repairs and poor living conditions - England
      • Repairs and poor living conditions - Wales
      • Being a landlord
    • Immigration and emigration
      • Immigration solicitors and legal advisers
      • Asylum
      • Emigration
    • Injuries
      • Negligence
    • Legal documents
    • My legal bill
    • Pets
      • What to consider before buying a pet
      • How old do I need to be to own a pet?
      • What pets are legal in the UK
      • Pet purchase protection
      • Pet owner responsibilities
      • Microchipping
    • Rights
      • I have been discriminated against
      • I want to know my rights
      • Your consumer rights this Christmas 
      • Your guide to defamation
    • Wills
      • I want to challenge a will
      • I want to make a will
      • Probate
      • Simpler choices when you make a will
  • At work
    • Confidentiality
    • Problems at work
      • Mental health in the workplace
      • Got a legal issue at work?
      • I’m not happy about something my employer has done
      • Speaking up about sexual harassment – Three things you should know
    • Employment rights
      • Covid vaccine: Can workers be forced to have the jab?
      • Time off
    • Redundancy and dismissal
      • Employment rights and dismissal
      • Redundancy and the law
  • In business
    • Copyright and ideas
      • Control of your images online 
      • Legal protection for ideas
      • Protecting ideas
    • Lawyer checklist
    • Factsheet: Business structure
    • Factsheet: Employment law
    • Factsheet: Tax law
    • Factsheet: Insurance for small business
    • Factsheet: Trading law
    • Factsheet: Premises and property
  • About
    • Types of legal advisers
      • Regulated legal advisers
        • Barristers
        • Chartered Legal Executives and CILEx Practitioners
        • Costs Lawyers
        • ICAEW Chartered Accountants and Legal Services
        • Immigration Advisers
        • Licensed Conveyancers
        • Notaries
        • Solicitors
        • Trade Mark Attorneys and Patent Attorneys
      • Other lawyers
        • Charity and Trade Union Advisers
        • McKenzie Friends
        • Mediators
        • Paralegals
        • Will Writers
      • Legal market place
        • Customer reviews and comparison sites
          • Finding out more on the provider’s website
          • Choosing a legal adviser – other factors
          • Leaving a review
          • Complaints to legal services providers
        • DIY
        • My legal options
    • Registers of legal professionals
    • Contact a legal regulator
    • If you want to complain
    • Legal costs
      • Conditional and contingency fee agreements
      • Law Centres
      • Legal aid
      • Legal insurance
      • Paying in instalments
      • Questions to ask lawyers
      • Sources of free legal advice
      • The Money Helper site
      • Why money laundering checks are important
    • About the Legal Choices website
      • Accessibility
      • Disclaimer statement
      • Privacy
      • Terms and conditions of use
    • Going online to find a legal adviser?
    • Can I handle some of my legal work myself?
Feedback
Thank you. This feedback helps us to improve.
Back to top