Skip to main content
BETA Regulatory Records. 3 minutes will help us improve.
Home
Menu
Search

Main navigation

  • At home
  • At work
  • In business
  • About

Main navigation

  • At home
  • At work
  • In business
  • About
  1. Home
  2. Disciplinary & Regulatory Records
  3. Robert Barber & Sons

Disciplinary Record - Robert Barber & Sons

Regulatory settlement agreement
Give feedback
Thank you. This feedback helps us to improve.

Disciplinary Record

Robert Barber & Sons

Regulatory settlement agreement

Details
Decision date
24/05/2024
Published date
28/05/2024

Decision - Agreement Outcome: Regulatory settlement agreement ...

Decision - Agreement

Outcome: Regulatory settlement agreement

Outcome date: 24 May 2024

Published date: 28 May 2024

Firm details

No detail provided:

Outcome details

This outcome was reached by agreement.

Decision details
1. Agreed outcome

1.1 Robert Barber & Sons (the Firm), a licensed body, agrees to the following outcome to the investigation of its conduct by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA):

  1. it is fined £12,400;
  2. to the publication of this agreement; and
  3. it will pay the costs of the investigation of £1,350.
2. Summary of Facts

2.1 The Firm acted for its client who sought to obtain a loan facility where Sylvester Amiel Lewin & Horne LLP acted for the lender. As consideration for the loan the lender would take a charge over two properties owned by the client.

2.2 The Firm provided two signed undertakings on 8 September 2021 to Sylvester Amiel Lewin & Horne LLP. These undertakings included specific actions where the Firm would submit relevant applications for registration of the lender's mortgage charge over the two properties with Companies House. This would be done within five working days of completion of the loan.

2.3 The undertakings included specific actions where the Firm would register the lenders charge at HM Land Registry as a first legal mortgage against the two properties.

2.4 Subsequently these elements of the undertakings were not satisfied by the Firm within the agreed timescales.

2.5 Completion of the loan took place on 10 September 2021. Charges were registered at HM Land Registry in April 2023. The loan was redeemed in May 2023 prior to the undertaking relating to the registration of the charge at Companies House being fulfilled.

3. Admissions

3.1 The Firm makes the following admissions which the SRA accepts:

  1. The Firm accepts that it failed to perform the above undertakings within the agreed timescale in breach of paragraph 1.3 of the SRA Code of Conduct for Firms.
  2. The Firm accepts that it acted in a way that failed to uphold public trust and confidence in the solicitors' profession in breach of Principle 2 of the SRA Principles.
4. Why a fine is an appropriate outcome

4.1 The SRA's Enforcement Strategy sets out its approach to the use of its enforcement powers where there has been a failure to meet its standards or requirements.

4.2 When considering the appropriate sanctions and controls in this matter, the SRA has taken into account the admissions made by the firm and the following mitigation which it has put forward:

  1. The Firm experienced difficulties in rectifying issues as it was no longer instructed by its client.
  2. The Firm has cooperated fully and promptly with the SRA investigation.
  3. This is an isolated incident and that is reflected in the Firm's regulatory history.
  4. The Firm did not financially benefit from the misconduct.

4.3 The SRA considers that a fine is the appropriate outcome because:

  1. Undertakings play a significant part in legal practice. A member of the public is reasonably entitled to expect that any solicitor or firm providing an undertaking will appreciate the importance of the obligation it creates and ensure it is fulfilled.
  2. The Firm created a risk of harm that continued for 18 months. During this time the lender's security for the loans was not protected as the securing assets were for a period liable to other charges being registered in priority.
  3. Due to the Firm's failure to complete its undertaking another party was able to register a charge on one of the properties. This risked compromising the lender's security. It was only because the loan was redeemed that this risk did not fully materialise. The conduct also impacted on the Firm's client as it had to instruct alternative solicitors to conclude the transaction.
  4. The Firm was culpable for the failure to fulfil the undertakings.
  5. A fine would deter the Firm and others from similar conduct in the future.

4.4 A fine is appropriate to maintain professional standards and uphold public confidence in the solicitors' profession. A publicised outcome will send an appropriate message to the Firm, the wider profession and the public that matters of this nature will be appropriately enforced. In this case there was a fundamental and prolonged failure to complete the agreed undertakings. A financial penalty therefore meets the requirements of rule 4.1 of the Regulatory and Disciplinary Procedure Rules.

5. Amount of the fine

5.1 The amount of the fine has been calculated in line with the SRA's published guidance on its approach to setting an appropriate financial penalty (the Guidance).

5.2 Having regard to the Guidance, the SRA and Firm agree that the nature of the misconduct was more serious. The Firm allowed the breaches of the undertakings to continue for 18 months and steps taken to rectify matters were unsuccessful. The breaches were reckless as there was no supervision of the matters. The Guidance gives misconduct of this type a nature score of three.

5.3 The SRA considers that the impact of the misconduct was medium because undertakings are a fundamental part of legal practice that underpin practice areas such as conveyancing. A failure to honour the undertakings in this case had the potential for moderate harm for any or all parties involved. Additionally, it had the potential to impact upon the wider trust and confidence the public have in the performance of undertakings and the professional generally. The Guidance gives this level of impact a score of four.

5.4 The nature and impact scores add up to seven. Therefore, the Guidance recommends a broad penalty bracket equating to 1.6 to 3.2 percent of domestic turnover.

5.5 In deciding the level of fine within this bracket, the SRA has considered the mitigation at paragraph 4.2 above which the Firm has put forward.

  1. The Firm experienced difficulties in rectifying issues as it was no longer instructed by its client.
  2. The Firm has cooperated fully and promptly with the SRA investigation.
  3. This is an isolated incident and that is reflected in the Firm's regulatory history.
  4. The Firm did not financially benefit from the misconduct

5.6 The level of cooperation is not a factor taken into account when determining the basic penalty. In accordance with the Guidance, cooperation is a matter that is considered in step two when calculating the appropriate adjustment to the basic penalty. Taking into account the other mitigating factors referenced by the Firm and weighing those up against the length of time the breaches continued for, the SRA considers a basic penalty in band C1 to be appropriate which is a fine of £16,558.

5.7 The SRA considers that the basic penalty should be reduced by 25 percent to £12,400. This reduction reflects the fact that the Firm cooperated with the investigation and made admissions to the conduct from the outset. The Firm made admissions regards its conduct in its first response to the SRA.

5.8 The Firm does not appear to have made any financial gain or received any other benefit as a result of its conduct. Therefore, no adjustment is necessary to remove this, and the amount of the fine is £12,400.

6. Publication

6.1 The SRA considers it appropriate that this agreement is published in the interests of transparency in the regulatory and disciplinary process. The Firm agrees to the publication of this agreement.

7. Acting in a way which is inconsistent with this agreement

7.1 The Firm agrees that it will not deny the admissions made in this agreement or act in any way which is inconsistent with it.

7.2 If the Firm denies the admissions or acts in a way which is inconsistent with this agreement, the conduct which is subject to this agreement may be considered further by the SRA. That may result in a disciplinary outcome or a referral to the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal on the original facts and allegations.

7.3 Acting in a way which is inconsistent with this agreement may also constitute a separate breach of principles 2 and 5 of the Principles and paragraph 3.2 of the Code of Conduct for Firms.

8. Costs

8.1 The Firm agrees to pay the costs of the SRA's investigation in the sum of £1,350. Such costs are due within 28 days of a statement of costs due being issued by the SRA.

Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) records last published to this site at 7:40am on 16 June 2025. Originally published on the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) website.

Give feedback
Thank you. This feedback helps us to improve.
Thank you. This feedback helps us to improve.

Footer menu

  • Accessibility
  • Getting in touch
  • Privacy and cookies
  • Terms and conditions of use

CLC CLSB The Faculty Office ICAEW CILEx Regulation IPReg SRABSB

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
© Legal Choices All Rights Reserved
Got a spare 5 minutes to help us improve our website?

I'll do itNo thanks

  • At home
    • Arrested
      • My child has been arrested
    • Carers
      • Why baby boomers should care about Britney
    • Claims
      • Problems with your pension?
      • No win no fee
    • Courts
      • I'm due in court
        • I'm due in a criminal court
        • I'm due in a civil court
        • I'm due in a Family court
        • I’m under 18 and going to court
      • I want to take someone to court
        • High value claims
        • Small claims
        • Personal injury
      • I want to represent myself in court
      • The lowdown on going to court
    • Debt
    • Families
      • Divorce
      • I'm young and have a problem
      • I've got family problems
      • Meeting your family lawyer for the first time?
      • Understanding family law
      • Domestic abuse
    • Housing
      • Buying and selling: Finding a legal adviser
      • ID and money home-buying checks - why they are needed
      • Problems with buying or selling
      • Evictions - England
      • Evictions - Wales
      • Rent money, deposits and fees - England
      • Rent Money, Deposits and Fees – Wales
      • Repairs and poor living conditions - England
      • Repairs and poor living conditions - Wales
      • Being a landlord
    • Immigration and emigration
      • Immigration solicitors and legal advisers
      • Asylum
      • Emigration
    • Injuries
      • Negligence
    • Legal documents
    • My legal bill
    • Pets
      • What to consider before buying a pet
      • How old do I need to be to own a pet?
      • What pets are legal in the UK
      • Pet purchase protection
      • Pet owner responsibilities
      • Microchipping
    • Rights
      • I have been discriminated against
      • I want to know my rights
      • Your consumer rights this Christmas 
      • Your guide to defamation
    • Wills
      • I want to challenge a will
      • I want to make a will
      • Probate
      • Simpler choices when you make a will
  • At work
    • Confidentiality
    • Problems at work
      • Mental health in the workplace
      • Got a legal issue at work?
      • I’m not happy about something my employer has done
      • Speaking up about sexual harassment – Three things you should know
    • Employment rights
      • Covid vaccine: Can workers be forced to have the jab?
      • Time off
    • Redundancy and dismissal
      • Employment rights and dismissal
      • Redundancy and the law
  • In business
    • Copyright and ideas
      • Control of your images online 
      • Legal protection for ideas
      • Protecting ideas
    • Lawyer checklist
    • Factsheet: Business structure
    • Factsheet: Employment law
    • Factsheet: Tax law
    • Factsheet: Insurance for small business
    • Factsheet: Trading law
    • Factsheet: Premises and property
  • About
    • Types of legal advisers
      • Regulated legal advisers
        • Barristers
        • Chartered Legal Executives and CILEx Practitioners
        • Costs Lawyers
        • ICAEW Chartered Accountants and Legal Services
        • Immigration Advisers
        • Licensed Conveyancers
        • Notaries
        • Solicitors
        • Trade Mark Attorneys and Patent Attorneys
      • Other legal advisers
        • Charity and Trade Union Advisers
        • McKenzie Friends
        • Mediators
        • Paralegals
        • Will Writers
      • Legal market place
        • Customer reviews and comparison sites
          • Finding out more on the provider’s website
          • Choosing a legal adviser – other factors
          • Leaving a review
          • Complaints to legal services providers
        • DIY
        • My legal options
    • Registers of legal professionals
    • Contact a legal regulator
    • If you want to complain
    • Legal costs
      • Conditional and contingency fee agreements
      • Law Centres
      • Legal aid
      • Legal insurance
      • Paying in instalments
      • Questions to ask lawyers
      • Sources of free legal advice
      • The Money Helper site
      • Why money laundering checks are important
    • About the Legal Choices website
      • Accessibility
      • Disclaimer statement
      • Privacy
      • Terms and conditions of use
    • Going online to find a legal adviser?
    • Can I handle some of my legal work myself?
    • What to expect from your legal adviser
Feedback
Thank you. This feedback helps us to improve.
Back to top